The iAntiVirus interface is very clean and easy to use. When IntelliGuard (or any other scan) finds a suspicious file, a Growl-like alert window pops up in the upper right hand corner of your Mac’s screen, letting you know what iAntiVirus has found and what steps it has taken. However, most users should be fine with the limited built-in scheduling.Ĭomplementing the three kinds of scans is IntelliGuard Real-Time Protection, which constantly runs in the background, protecting your Mac from nefarious files. Ideally, you should be able to define the day on which weekly scans are done and create entirely custom schedules–scanning on the second Wednesday of the month, say. (Installation of updates for both virus definitions and the app itself can be scheduled as well, with the same options.) These scheduling options are basic at best. You can also schedule iAntiVirus to scan your Mac once a week, daily, every other day, or never. Archive files (zip files, for example) can be optionally scanned for viruses as well. If you have a particular set of folders that you want to examine, then a Custom scan is what you want. The Normal scan takes longer but is far more comprehensive. Quick scan is, not surprisingly, the fastest of the three, but it scans only certain areas of your Mac’s hard drive (those that are known to typically harbor malware). IAntiVirus offers three flavors of scans: Quick, Normal, and Custom. iAntiVirus took a little over an hour to scan both drives in my Mac Pro, which hold about 830GB of data. PC Tools made this choice so the app would be lightweight its database is small, and it can scan many files very quickly. Vaccination vaccine hesitancy Internet Poland.IAntiVirus 1.0 from PC Tools takes a different approach: its threat database only contains signatures for known Mac-specific malware (including viruses, worms, trojans, and the like), though the scanning engine is capable of scanning for PC threats as well. It would be important to regularly monitor various services and forms of communication on the Internet in terms of the content of anti-vaccinaton information. A significant part of the posts had a strongly emotional form. The content of the posts is very diverse and shows numerous users’ doubts. The most common design was providing links to anti-vaccine sites (29.9%) The most frequently discussed topic was the relation between vaccination and idiopathic illnesses (26.1%). The number of users and posts was increasing for the first four years and then started to decrease. (2002) were used for coding content and design of posts. The number of new users and new posts in the years 2008-2018 was examined, as well as the type of content and design of the selected 407 posts from 2009-2015. To examine posting on the online forum “Nie szczepimy” (We don’t vaccinate). There is no national research on Internet anti-vaccination content. People who are looking for such information can find negative opinions on the web, so it is important to keep track of the content there. The Internet is an important source of information about vaccinations. In Poland, there is a visible strengthening of hesitant attitudes towards vaccination, as well as institutionalization and politicization of hesitancy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |